Municipalities

SIA Guidelines

SIA Guidelines
Manual

GIZ and its SIA Working Group are very active in developing guidelines for sustainable industrial areas and intend to stimulate a worldwide standard setting process. The GIZ SIA Guidelines shall give orientation when establishing sustainable industrial parks or developing a legal framework for sustainable industrial area development. The structure of the GIZ Guidelines for sustainable industrial areas is based on the following four features – organisational features, economic and infrastructure features, environmental features and social features.

UNIDO, the WORLD BANK GROUP and GIZ are working on international guidelines and a handbook on minimum requirements and performance monitoring for eco-industrial parks.

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

The SIA Guidelines for the development of Sustainable Industrial Areas focus on the management level of an industrial zone or park. They intend to guide the industrial area as a whole to become more sustainable. The focus of the guidelines does not lie on the individual companies. The sus­tainability performance of companies inside the area is assumed to be guided by respective sector or company related rules or standards. However, a sustainability framework on park level is likely to initiate and promote also positive changes at company level.

The four aspects highlighted and some exemplary features are:

  • Organisational Features: Site master planning, management structure, networking and cooperation, and disaster risk management.
  • Economic and Infrastructure Features: Economic viability of management, fiscal effects on the municipality, infrastructure provision and logistics in general.
  • Environmental Features: Promotion of resource efficiency and industrial symbiosis, monitoring and control of emissions, and climate change mitigation and adaptation.
  • Social Features: Social infrastructure, promotion of gender equality, security concept, and encouragement of trade unions and NGOs.

Implementation / work steps

The Guidelines consider it necessary and advisable to foresee a staged approach in defining several performance levels (e.g. minimum, medium and advanced) as they can only provide a first overview of the most important sustainability aspects for planning and operating an industrial area. This needs of course further specification and precise definitions. So far, the Guidelines have been translated in Chinese, Spanish and Bahasa /Indonesia.

Output

The SIA Guidelines provide a first overview of the most important sustainability aspects for planning and operating an industrial area.

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Introducing SIA, Designing SIA, Operating SIA

Level of intervention
Park management, Planning level

Themes
Standards

Target groups
Industrial area management and operator, Local and international consultants and advisors, Municipalities

Regions
Africa, Americas, Asia, Europe, Oceania

Site Assessment

Site Assessment
Tool

For siting of industries economic factors, such as availability of raw materials, market for finished product, transportation networks, water supply, electricity, labour availability etc., the environmental factors, such as possible adverse effects on biodiversity, natural resources, and ecosystem services, exposure to climate hazards and short- as well as long-term impacts of climate change, and social factors need to be considered.

The industries are to be benchmarked by the degree of pollution potential. Relating their degree of potential risk with the distance to site sensitivities, the suitable sites can be found. To make the tool cost effective, the assessments are undertaken at regional level followed by at site level. The regional level or macro level studies eliminate unsuitable areas and identify potential alternate sites/zones for which detailed micro level studies are then conducted to arrive at the best suitable site.

The best practice examples and manuals from India help to apply guidelines to take environmental aspects into account when setting up new industrial parks. Thus, environmental regulatory authorities are specially addressed.

Consideration of climate change aspects (Climate Risk Assessment) is presented in more detail in the Climate Change Section.

 

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

Ideally, the planning of industrial areas should follow a three-step approach:

(1) a regional assessment to identify potential industrial sites/zones;

(2) a subsequent detailed comparative site suitability assessment of these pre-selected sites; and finally,

(3) the selection the best suited one for implementation planning.

The regional assessment is geared to identify sites suitable for siting of industries at a regional level and follows a three-step approach which is reflected in the guideline.

  • In the first step environmental sensitive zones to be avoided for location of industries or to be protected from direct impacts of industrial activities are identified. Part A of the Guidelines for Regional Environmental Assessment provides criteria to be considered in this selection analysis; i.e. the biological diversity of an area, and sensitive or incompatible land uses.

  • After having eliminated these sensitive zones, the remaining areas are classified according to their suitability for location of industries. The suitability is assessed using the sensitivity of the areas against two types of industrial impacts: Air pollution, and water pollution. Parts B and C of the Guidelines for Regional Environmental Assessment provide criteria to be considered in this suitability analysis.

  • The last step of the regional assessment is the synthesis of the preceding steps to compile a regional suitability assessment for the siting of industries. Part D. of the Guidelines for Regional Environmental Assessment provides guidance for the implementation of the synthesis analysis.

  • In days of climate change the regional assessment should be further supported by climate adaptation and mitigation related considerations. These are further detailed in the Climate Change Section.

A regional assessment requires a minimum of data and information input. Only in a few cases respective environmental databases or atlases might be available. The Themes for State and District Environmental Atlases provide reference data catalogues to facilitate data collection.

To consistently execute the subsequent detailed site suitability assessment, more detailed information on the industries to be sited is required. The core task of this step is to benchmark the environmental sensitivity of the pre-selected sites against the environmental performance and impacts of the industries to be sited. In fact, the approach applied at the regional level is to be applied again in more detail on the local level using more detailed information and data.

As a pre-requisite criteria and rules for the definition of the pollution potential and environmental risk caused by the specific industries have to be agreed upon and defined.

Implementation / work steps

Topics for the regional assessment:

Regional level environmental assessments (Macro-level Zoning Atlas studies) in 1:250,000 scale taking into consideration:

  • Physical and geographical aspects of land, viz. land use, drainage, topography, soils etc.
  • Sensitive zones to be avoided, including legally restricted areas, environmentally sensitive areas, sensitive areas based on historic/religious/social considerations.
  • Air pollution sensitivity based on land use sensitivity, dispersion sensitivity (topography, meteorology) and pollution potential of industries.
  • Surface water pollution sensitivity based on flow in rivers/lakes, water use sensitivity (public supplies, drinking etc.), water quality and pollution potential of industries.

Identification of a search area from the suitable areas of macro-level studies in 1:250,000 scale taking into consideration:

  • Land availability - extent of land to suit to the industrialisation demand, preferably wastelands
  • Land ownership - government or private land lease in acquisition
  • Electricity - nearness or distance of various pre-final sites from nearest existing sub-station/power plant
  • Nearness to the major settlement - distance of nearest major settlement from all the pre-final candidate sites
  • Water availability - distance from source of water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
  • Distance from existing industrial areas
  • Distance from sensitive zone
  • Drainage - distance of major rivers or drains from the pre-final sites
  • Nearness to transportation network for economic handling of both raw materials and finished goods
  • Environmental sensitivity of the area to suit to the needed industrial development
  • Transportation facility: distance from existing railway line and highway

Results of the regional assessment:

  • Identification of areas to be avoided for siting of industrial estates
  • Identification of candidate sites based on socio-economic factors from the areas other than those areas to be avoided.
  • Rapid environmental assessment of the candidate sites and identification of potential site(s)
  • Assessment of sensitivity of land use and air/water pollution sensitivity and suitability to industries
  • Recommendations on:
  • Site(s) for industrial estates
  • Suitability to industries

 

Topics for the detailed local site suitability assessment:

Mapping of the study area (25 km around the candidate site) in 1:50,000 scale, including:

  • Base Map
  • Village reference Map
  • Land use/Land cover Map
  • Slope Map or Drainage Map
  • Hydrogeomorphology Map
  • Existing industries map
  • Infrastructure map (transportation network, water availability, electricity etc.)
  • Air quality map
  • Surface water quality map
  • Ground water quality map
  • Environmentally sensitive zones and resource areas
  • Land use development concept around the site

Requirements

  • Information about the environmental impact of industries.
  • Detailed geographical information about the land and its attributes (geography, drainage, hydro- geomorphology etc.), surface and ground water features, environmentally sensitive zones, major sources of pollution and environmental quality attributes.
  • The willingness of the stakeholders, industries or industrial park developer for sustainable land allotment.
  • Information about the environmental impact of industries
  • Detailed geographical information about the land and its attributes (geography, drainage, hydro- geomorphology etc.), surface and ground water features, environmentally sensitive zones, major sources of pollution and environmental quality attributes
  • The willingness of the stakeholders, industries or industrial park developer for sustainable land allotment

Lessons learnt

The Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi (apex body in India for prevention & control of pollution, an agency under the Indian Ministry of Environment & Forests) has undertaken regional level assessments (Zoning Atlases) for over 150 districts in India and identified potential zones for siting of industries and industrial estates.

Output

The exact analysis of the environmental situation will give first ideas about future impacts on the natural environment and the local community as well as requires limits and preventive measures to minimise the risks.

Guideline for decision makers including industrial park developers, industrial entrepreneurs, regulatory authorities and public use.

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Introducing SIA, Analysis, Designing SIA, Master planning

Level of intervention
Planning level

Themes
Environmental Clearence

Target groups
Industrial area management and operator, Local and international consultants and advisors, Municipalities, Private investors

Countries
India

Regions
Asia

GIZ project
Advisory Services in Environmental Management (ASEM)

Duration
Depending on data availability and existing structures, approx. 6 months

Complexity
complex

Related tools
Guideline for Adaptation and Increasing Resilience of Industrial Parks to the Impacts of Climate Change, Manual for Adaption and Increasing Resilience of Industrial Parks to the Impacts of Climate Change

Baseline Analysis Tool

Baseline Analysis Tool
Tool

A[PB1] viable baseline of industrial parks is an essential prerequisite for planning and implementation of any retrofitting or upgrading measures related to sustainable and/or climate resilient industrial areas.

The baseline information is required:

  • to identify hot-spots for action;

  • to document the evolution of the indicators of the measures / the project and provide pieces of evidence of progress and achievements;

  • to provide information for new policies and support the monitoring of the sector.

 

The baseline analysis tool serves as a guideline for this process and provides the information required. The baseline analysis focuses on the industrial park and the relevant authority as core area while for some specific issues the neighbouring communities as well as environmental officers or environmental authorities are to be included.

  •  



 

 

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

The baseline analysis tool comprises between 6 and 8 main steps designed to:

  • Create adequate working and communication structures

  • Get the relevant stakeholders on board and provide them with basic information on the EID project

  • Acquire and interpret information and data on industrial parks and on their relationship with the main actors of the industrial sectors (public authorities, single companies)

  • Develop a preliminary strategy

  • Discuss, revise and decide the strategy together with the stakeholders in a participatory approach

  • Design a work plan (and eventually establish an EID-team)

  • Create a strategy for the partner, to continue to use the baseline for his own strategy

 

Implementation / work steps

The baseline analysis tool comprises between 6 and 8 main steps:

  • Definition of the scope of the baseline analysis with the partner

  • Information of stakeholders

  • Training of the interviewer

  • Data collection

  • Assessment and consolidation

  • Dispersion and publication of the main results

  • Consultation of stakeholders

  • First Work Plan

Requirements

  • Companies submit self-monitoring reports to the environmental authority and the administration of the Industrial Area

  • Self-monitoring reports are accessible

  • The tool can be adapted to other frameworks and conditions, if self-monitoring reports of companies or equal data sources are not available

Lessons learnt

Positive driving factors identified during the application of the tool by PEZA (Philippines Economic Zone Authority) are:

  • Strong local implementing structure and industrial associations

  • Engaged administration of the Industrial Area

  • Comprehensive strategy and baseline data available

  • Stakeholders involved

Obstacles hampering implementation:

  • No or only few data already fed into database

  • Inconsistent Self-Monitoring Reports of companies

  • Self-monitoring reports of companies not regularly submitted

Output

  • Eco-Zone Profile (General information, local PEZA structure, characterization of key actors, EID-profile Eco-Zone, EID- Profile locators
  • Outline of EID-strategy (priority fields for action, gap assessment)
  • Tentative work plan and project team

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Introducing SIA, Analysis, Designing SIA, Operating SIA, Climate change

Level of intervention
Company, Park management

Target groups
Community representatives, Companies, SME, Industrial area management and operator, Municipalities

Countries
Philippines

Regions
Asia

GIZ project
Developing a Management Approach for Eco-Industrial Development in Philippine Economic Zones

Duration
Approx. 6 months depending on data availability

Complexity
medium

Pathway to Eco Industrial Development in India

Pathway to Eco Industrial Development in India
Case Study

The industrial sector is a key driver of India’s impressive economic growth and, well-aware of the current environmental challenges, the Indian government and the industrial sector are giving much attention to sustainable development.

With this focus, the government and the industry have applied the Eco Industrial Development approach in the Indian context. It is seen that on the industrial park level, the challenge of Eco Industrial Development can be tackled by developing new as well as by transforming existing parks into Eco Industrial Parks.

The publication on Pathway to Eco Industrial Development in India effectively highlights various areas of work with specific examples of the achievements in sustainable development.

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

The publication on Pathway to Eco Industrial Development in India shows that thorough planning of new Eco Industrial Parks not only helps to reduce pollution, resource consumption and environmental impacts; but also ensures appropriate location, suitable infrastructure, synergy effects and public acceptance. All this helps enhance efficiency to a great extent. In addition to the environmental and social benefits, these features make new parks more attractive for investors.

On the individual industry level as well much can be done to improve environmental performance. Many examples described in this publication have illustrated the benefits of this process. It enables companies to gain monetary benefits while at the same time reducing their demand for raw material and energy, and minimising associated environmental impacts from emissions, effluents and wastes.

Implementation / work steps

Supported by appropriate information systems and training programmes, the management of industrial sites and individual industries have implemented promising measures.

Supported by trainings and advice from experts, many industries have successfully taken measures to improve their environmental performance.

Lessons learnt

Experiences in India show that even old parks with serious environmental problems can be transformed with often simple and inexpensive measures.

Output

The publication on Pathway to Eco Industrial Development in India effectively highlights various areas of work with specific examples of the achievements in sustainable development.

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Introducing SIA, Sensitisation

Level of intervention
Company, Park management, Planning level

Themes
Sensitisation

Target groups
Companies, SME, Industrial area management and operator, Municipalities, Policy makers

Countries
India

Regions
Asia

GIZ project
Sustainable environment-friendly industrial production (SEIP II) in India

Co-Processing of Waste Materials in the Cement Industry

Co-Processing of Waste Materials in the Cement Industry
Best Practice Example

In a joint initiative the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH (GIZ) and Holcim Group Support LTD (Holcim) have developed Guidelines on Co-Processing Waste Materials in Cement Production which provide information on the use of waste material as an alternative resource for energy and material recovery in an environmentally sound manner. Additionally, GIZ and Holcim have developed and compiled a modular training kit designed to teach relevant staff from the public and private sector on the topic of co-processing. The training kit takes into consideration the specific framework conditions in emerging and developing countries and will enable participants to understand the benefits, risks and opportunities of co-processing as a contribution towards sustainable development.

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

Co-processing can reduce the consumption of primary fuels and raw materials by using energy and material values contained in waste streams. The use of alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR) in cement kilns can therefore decrease the environmental impacts of wastes, safely dispose of hazardous wastes, decrease greenhouse gas emissions, decrease waste handling costs and save money in the cement industry.

Co-processing requires capacity building on environmental, operational, legal, occupational health and safety, social and communication aspects.

The training targets are based on the requirements for capacity building as stipulated in the guidelines mentioned above such as:

  • Formulation of waste management policies
  • Formulation and interpretation of waste statistics
  • Authorization and controlling of co-processing
  • Assessment of new materials for co-processing and waste source qualification
  • Monitoring of operation and transportation (methodologies of emission analysis and evaluation of analytical data)
  • Management of occupational health and safety of the workers within the cement plant and during transportation
  • Enforcement of the national regulations and permissions
  • Systematic communication with stakeholders and the public

Implementation / work steps

The training kit consists of several practice-oriented modules. The modules contain slides for presentation, an accompanying textbook with instruction advice for the trainer and additional training material such as practical exercises, case studies etc. According to the requirements of the participants on capacity building, the most useful modules can be put together for specific training:

  • Module 1: Introduction
  • Module 2: Waste Management
  • Module 3: Understand Cement Production
  • Module 4: Application of Pre- and Co-Processing in Cement Production
  • Module 5: Occupational Health and Safety
  • Module 6: Legislation and Permitting
  • Module 7: Corporate Social Responsibility and Communication
  • Module 8: Life Cycle Thinking and Assessment for Waste Management and Co-processing

The first training package is aimed at public authorities at national, regional and local level and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) dealing with the issue of waste management and co-processing. At a later stage the target group could be extended to cement operators, waste handling companies and to waste generators.

Output

Participants will be able to apply different tools to implement and supervise co-processing successfully.

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Designing SIA, Technical infrastructure

Level of intervention
Company, Park management

Themes
Energy efficiency, Resource efficiency, Technical infrastructure, Technology, Technology Transfer

Target groups
Companies, SME, Industrial area management and operator, Local and international consultants and advisors, Municipalities, Policy makers

Countries
Chile, Mexico, Morocco, Philippines

Regions
Global

Sustainable Port Development in the ASEAN Region

Sustainable Port Development in the ASEAN Region
Manual

The sustainable port development programme in the ASEAN region assists to shift the emphasis from mere reactive complying with minimum standards to a pro-active approach to achieve quality and sustainability in safety, health and environmental (SHE) management in the participating ports.

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

The project signed a collaboration agreement with the Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) with the objective to jointly assist partner ports to implement and continually improve Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) management under an integrated systematic approach in accordance with the provisions of the Port Safety, Health and Environmental Management (PSHEM) Code, a standard developed by PEMSEA. The project strengthens port authorities, private terminal operators and other public or private companies.

The project intends to focus on the following key areas:

  • National level SHE policies, regulations and inspections involvement
  • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
  • Green / Sustainable port policies
  • Stakeholder involvement in SHE
  • Exchange and dissemination of experience and of best practices

Implementation / work steps

ASEAN Ports Association (APA)

  • Responsible for coordinating the implementation of the project
  • Associated personnel to support the project will be made available when necessary

Participating Ports

  • Provide a regional project office (Port Authority of Thailand)
  • Provide management support
  • Actively participate in project activities
  • Assigns focal persons to the project
  • Provide training facilities

National Level

  • Provides a platform for discussion on key legislative issues and international regulations and conventions
  • Actively participate in project activities
  • Assigns focal persons to the project
  • Provide training facilities

Output

Project Achievements 2009-2012:

  • 7 ports developed, improved and/or implemented a Port SHE Management System (PSHEMS)
  • 2 ports established a SHE department
  • 3 ports improved Ship Waste Reception and Waste Management (MARPOL 73/78); awareness towards a regional approach was realized
  • 7 port emission inventories were completed
  • a guideline for efficient traffic management in the port area was developed
  • a platform for ports and ministries to discuss technical and regulatory issues in a regional context was organized

Further benefits:

  • Enhanced compliance with international conventions
  • Stable, transparent and regionally harmonized legal framework
  • Efficient Management Systems that reduce risks and pollution at source to prevent environmental and socio-economic damages
  • Risk Management and Contingency Planning
  • Improved Safety and health conditions through the provision of adequate training
  • Close cooperation and consultation between all stakeholders
  • Improved trading conditions

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Designing SIA, Technical infrastructure

Level of intervention
Park management

Themes
Policies & Regulations, Technical infrastructure, Transport & Logistics

Target groups
Companies, SME, Industrial area management and operator, Municipalities, Private investors

Regions
Asia

Wastewater management in industrial parks

Wastewater management in industrial parks
Best Practice Example

Common effluent collection and treatment systems in industrial parks are often either not existing, dysfunctional or not functioning properly in many developing countries. The causes are diverse and must be thoroughly examined from case to case.

The tool includes case studies, best practice examples and management manuals elaborated by GIZ and KfW projects in various Asian countries.

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

The tool presents experiences from four Asian countries:

India

Under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of India, 1974, every industry must provide adequate treatment of its effluents before disposal, irrespective of whether it is discharged to river, land, sewerage system or sea. The Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETP) are considered a viable treatment solution for collective treatment of effluents, from small and medium scale industries particularly. CETPs could potentially help in achieving treatment of combined wastewater from various industries at lower unit costs and help facilitating better compliance and monitoring according to standards. However, there are several challenges associated with CETPs. As per a report of the Central Pollution Control Board (2005), less than 7% of CETPs in India is complying with wastewater discharge standards.

The GIZ technical cooperation programme/project IGEP/SEIP supports pilot projects demonstrating financially sustainable solutions for waste water treatment in selected industrial areas through CETPs. The solutions focus on technical, business and management issues for successful operation of CETPs. The pilot activities are focused in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Gujarat. The experiences of the pilot examples are documented, and their actual replication is targeted in different industrial areas of different states.

The approach includes comprehensive stakeholder consultations. Capacity building and knowledge management activities are undertaken simultaneously. Finally, solutions demonstrated, and lessons learned shall be incorporated into policies, planning processes and guidelines.

Pakistan

(To be amended in case materials are made available)

Philippines

The Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) developed a Guideline for Wastewater Management under the cooperation programme “Management Approach to Eco-Industrial Development of Philippine Economic Zones” with GIZ. The guideline provides orientation regarding the relevant laws and regulations and assists management of industrial estates and companies as well as service providers in managing their wastewater.

The Guideline contains general requirements for economic zones and their companies generating wastewater, instructions on managing wastewater, connecting to the CWTF (Centralized Wastewater Treatment Facility), pre-treatment of wastewater, securing wastewater discharge permit, and self-regulation, monitoring and reporting among others. During the project a technical audit of the Sewage Treatment Plant and the Sewerage System was executed to identify reasons for improper functioning. Based on the results and the technology implemented a Standard Manual of Operation was developed and set in force by PEZA with assistance from GIZ.

To establish the required capacities and skills for proper operation some technical training was executed. The main topic was the proper operation of the activated sludge process.

Vietnam

There are around 200 registered industrial zones (IZ) in Vietnam lacking a sustainably functioning waste water concept. This has serious consequences for the environment. The Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in cooperation with KfW Entwicklungsbank developed an integrated wastewater management concept for the industrial area Tra Noc in the City of Can Tho in the Mekong Delta.

The integrated wastewater concept ensures the efficient functioning of the integral system with all its components in an economically and ecologically sustainable way. An essential component of the integrated concept is not only the combination of central and decentral technological approaches but also the direct linkage of the technical and the financial planning following fee and cost allocation models that are oriented towards decision-making and apply the ‘user pays’ principle.

Implementation / work steps

The following steps are decisive for the success of activities related to management of waste water:

  • Execution of a baseline survey and/or situation analysis to identify the exact problems to be tackled with respect to ‘Industrial Waste Water Management’ (Common Effluent Treatment Plants).
  • Based on this, appropriate pilots are planned and implemented to demonstrate and generate knowledge on financially sustainable solutions for CETPs.
  • Stakeholder consultations are facilitated through workshops, and information on CETPs is shared and exchanged.
  • Policy dialogues are undertaken for development of nationally and locally relevant standards, rules and policies.
  • Building knowledge based on CETPs and the development of capacities at various levels underlie all the above-mentioned activities.
  • Feedback from the pilot measures and practical experience will be guided into the formulation/review of policy guidelines (standards, rules, policies etc.) at national/state/local level.

Output

  • Development of a Guideline for Wastewater Management
  • Development of a Standard Manual of Operation for Sewage Treatment Plants

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Designing SIA, Master planning, Retrofitting, Technical infrastructure, Operating SIA, Management

Level of intervention
Company, Park management

Themes
Participation and Stakeholder Management, Policies & Regulations, Retrofitting, Technical infrastructure, Technology, Technology Transfer

Target groups
Community representatives, Companies, SME, Industrial area management and operator, Municipalities, Policy makers, Private investors

Countries
India, Pakistan, Philippines, Vietnam

Regions
Asia

Duration
varying

Complexity
complex

CSR Toolkit

CSR Toolkit
Manual

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the commitment of the private sector to social concerns beyond legal requirements. This can be either company-internal commitment (employees’ welfare) or in the social environment of the enterprise (community relations). Ideally, CSR is implemented in the area of business operation.

Sustainable development in Industrial Areas requires an integrated approach towards stimulating economic growth, embedding environmental protection and economic development in a stable and prosperous social environment. Well-developed CSR projects enhance community relations, ease conflict potential, enable communal service providers / communal small businesses to meet industrial park requirements and support the capacity building of more employable local workforce.

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

Current CSR practices focus on donating money and materials and are not sustainability-oriented. This does not lead to long-term improvements of the beneficiaries living conditions. As a result, the demands of communities towards business for donations rise and community dependency rather than development is fostered.

The tool was designed for the specific requirements of the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) to promote and foster CSR activities in the Philippine Economic Zones. In this context the tool describes a sequence of work steps to be pursued by the industrial park management body. These are:

  • Developing a CSR policy
    • Realizing the importance to cooperate to address ecozone-community related concerns
    • Smouldering conflicts
  • Outlining a local development plan
    • Assessing community demands and economic zone potentials
  • Identify project counterparts
    • E.g. informal sector, local people’s organisation, urban poor groups
  • Project development
    • Project seeks to raise awareness
    • Project aims at small business development
  • Project implementation
    • Project managed by communal people’s organisation
    • Supported by PEZA-EID
    • Supported by MEZ locators/ industry associations
  • Securing sustainability and options for replication
    • Monitoring
    • Documentation
    • Evaluation

Implementation / work steps

The following information should be compiled at the beginning:

  • Community Profiles
  • Social Baseline Study

Requirements

The following actors with the following roles are involved:

  • Responsible unit at the industrial park management body acts as facilitator
  • Park Management acts as co-facilitator, handles promotion and direct contact to companies
  • Companies act as co-facilitators / co-founders for community-related activities, co-implementing partner and beneficiary for company-internal CSR
  • Industry Association: promotion and direct contact to companies
  • Municipalities / community people’s organisations / informal sector: beneficiaries, contribute manpower

Lessons learnt

CSR activities can be fostered by the following factors:

  • Demands and requirements of the industrial park that can be catered to by local communities
  • Corporate policy or requirements by big corporations
  • CSR projects are implementable in the social environment of every industrial park, project development is dependent of specific local need, capacities and requirements
  • Cooperate with industrial park associations to secure the company connection

CSR activities can be hampered by the following factors:

  • Insufficient communication between the industrial park and the surrounding community can hamper project development
  • Companies reluctant to change their donation-approach
  • Insufficient staff to secure documentation, monitoring and evaluation of CSR projects

Output

  • CSR project proposals in and around industrial areas that support sustainable and independent community development and respond to industrial park needs and requirements
  • Small business development in catering to companies’ and industrial parks’ needs

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Introducing SIA, Sensitisation, Standards, Designing SIA, Retrofitting

Level of intervention
Company

Themes
Awareness Raising, Retrofitting, Sensitisation, Standards

Target groups
Community representatives, Companies, SME, Industrial area management and operator, Municipalities

Countries
Philippines

Regions
Asia

GIZ project
Developing a Management Approach for Eco-Industrial Development in Philippine Economic Zones

Complexity
complex

Further information

Downloads
PDF icon Roadmap to CSR.pdf (243.8 KB)
PDF icon CSR Project Guideline.pdf (42.66 KB)
PDF icon CSR Flyer.pdf (527.74 KB)
PDF icon CSR Workshop Proposal.pdf (63.35 KB)

Disaster Risk Management Training Modules

Disaster Risk Management Training Modules
Training

Capacity Development is the basis for a proactive strategy requiring a collaborative effort for on-site emergency plans of the corporate sector, the civil society, first regulators, and planning and supervisory administrative units.

The Human Resource Development Programme in industrial Disaster Risk Management in India (HRDP iDRM), and the Human Capacity Development Programme Environmental Planning and Disaster Risk Management (EPDRM) produced a series of standalone training modules covering the key topics of industrial disaster risk management and response.

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

Training modules developed under the iDRM HRDP and EPDRM can be used for a complete training programme or as standalone modules. They are deigned to be used in training or for self-learning. There are three groups of modules:

  • A training programme of 15 modules addressing the key topics of industrial disaster risk management (elaborated together with DMI Bhopal);
  • A training programme of 6 modules addressing topics of civil defence; most of these also relevant for the industrial context (elaborated together with NCDC Nagpur);
  • A training programme of 6 modules targeting general topics of environmental disaster risk management; most of these also relevant for the industrial context (elaborated together with NIDM Delhi).

Output

  • Risk assessment
  • Emergency planning, such as development of emergency response procedures

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Introducing SIA, Sensitisation, Designing SIA, Retrofitting, Operating SIA, Management, Climate change

Level of intervention
Company, Park management, Policy level (central), Policy level (decentral)

Themes
Management, Master planning, Retrofitting

Target groups
Companies, SME, Industrial area management and operator, Municipalities, Policy makers

Countries
India

Regions
Asia

Complexity
complex

Brown-field development

Brown-field development
Best Practice Example

The tool refers to methodology and guidelines to reactivate brownfields for industrial development. Investors looking for real estate should benefit from a shorter process for planning and locating their businesses compared to setting up on green-fields. Furthermore, green-fields can be saved, jobs created and the quality of life for surrounding neighbourhoods improved.

© GIZ

© GIZ

Main features and components

  • Guidelines for land recycling, implications for urban development, project management, financing issues
  • Management cycle
  • Description of steps to apply for public funds

Implementation / work steps

  • Identification of a suitable site
  • Cost calculation
  • Land recycling
  • Marketing

Requirements

  • Demand for real estate from companies
  • Brownfields
  • Data about the derelict sites as a basis of investment decisions:
    • Former usage of the site
    • Kind of pollution
    • Available infrastructure

Output

  • Attractive sites for new investments (less costly and faster to make use of, infrastructural setup already existent)
  • Less demand for green-fields
  • Job creation
  • Rising quality of life for surrounding neighbourhoods

Characteristics

Phase of intervention
Designing SIA, Retrofitting

Level of intervention
Planning level

Themes
Brown-field Recycling

Target groups
Municipalities, Private investors

Countries
Germany, Romania

Regions
Europe

Duration
5-10 months planning period; 2-5 years until reactivated site can be used

Complexity
complex

Related tools
Baseline Analysis Tool